Global South and Multipolarity Explained: BRICS+, De-Dollarization, India’s Rise and the New World Order

A complete International Relations guide on Global South and multipolarity, covering BRICS+, de-dollarization, India’s strategic pivot, Africa’s reorientation and Global South vs G7. Useful for UPSC, UGC-NET, IFS, AP Comparative Government, GRE, FSOT, EU Concours and global IR exams.

Rise of the Global South & Multipolarity | BRICS+, De-Dollarization, India’s Pivot | IASNOVA
🌐 International Relations · Exam Study Guide

Rise of the Global South & Multipolarity

BRICS+, De-Dollarization, India’s Pivot, Africa’s Strategic Reorientation & Global South vs G7 — Academic depth with visual clarity for competitive exam excellence.

UPSC CSE IFS UGC-NET UPPSC BPSC JPSC US FSOT GRE Pol.Sci AP Comp.Gov EU Concours FCDO UK Sciences Po

© IASNOVA.COM — Authorised Study Resource

What is the Global South? IASNOVA.COM

The term ‘Global South’ transcends simple geography. It denotes a political, economic, and historical condition — broadly encompassing nations across Africa, Latin America, Asia, and parts of Oceania that share experiences of colonialism, post-colonial underdevelopment, structural marginalisation in global governance institutions (IMF, World Bank, UNSC), and ongoing demands for equitable international order reform.

📌 Core Definition
Global South ≠ simply “developing countries.” It is a political solidarity category rooted in shared historical grievances: colonial extraction, unequal trade terms (terms of trade argument), exclusion from decision-making in Bretton Woods institutions, and the desire to reshape global governance norms.

Theoretical Roots

  • Bandung Conference (1955): First assertion of Afro-Asian solidarity — birth of Third World identity politics.
  • Non-Aligned Movement (NAM, 1961): Formal institutionalisation of neutrality between Cold War blocs; foundational to Global South solidarity.
  • G77 (1964): Multilateral coalition for collective economic bargaining at the UN — still the largest intergovernmental organisation of developing nations (134+ members today).
  • New International Economic Order (NIEO, 1974): UN Declaration demanding structural reform of global trade and finance — a forerunner of today’s de-dollarisation and IMF reform debates.
  • Dependency Theory (Cardoso, Frank, Wallerstein): Academic framework explaining Global South underdevelopment as structural outcome of core-periphery exploitation.
  • Post-Cold War Reconceptualisation: After 1991, ‘Third World’ ceded to ‘Global South’ — a more agency-centred framing emphasising collective voice, not mere victimhood.

Who Comprises the Global South?

~130
Countries broadly identified as Global South
~85%
Share of global population living in Global South nations
~40%
Share of global GDP (PPP) — rising fast
$0
Permanent UNSC seats held by the Global South (until reform)
⚠️ Nuance for Advanced Exams (IFS, EU Concours, GRE)
The ‘Global South’ is internally heterogeneous: China claims solidarity but is a UNSC P5 member and global creditor. Gulf states are wealthy but post-colonial. Brazil, India, South Africa are middle powers with contradictory positions — they simultaneously seek reform of the system while benefiting from it (IFS Mains, EU Concours AD-level question territory).

© IASNOVA.COM

Theory of Multipolarity IASNOVA.COM

Multipolarity describes a global power distribution characterised by multiple centres of influence, contrasted with bipolarity (Cold War: US vs USSR) and unipolarity (post-1991: US-led ‘unipolar moment’). The 21st century’s structural shift toward multipolarity is the organising principle behind the Global South’s rise.

Polarity Typology at a Glance

Polarity TypeEraPower StructureKey Stability Theory
MultipolarPre-19145+ great powers (UK, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia)Balance of Power (Kissinger)
Bipolar1947–1991US vs USSR + aligned blocsWaltz: Bipolar most stable; MAD deterrence
Unipolar1991–~2008US ‘hyperpower’ dominanceKrauthammer’s ‘Unipolar Moment’; Ikenberry’s Liberal Order
Emerging Multipolar2008–presentUS + China + Russia + EU + India + Regional PowersContested: Mearsheimer (instability) vs Acharya (multiplex world)

Why Now? — Structural Drivers of Multipolarity

  • China’s Rise: From 3.6% of world GDP (1990) to ~18% (2024, PPP) — the most consequential redistribution of economic power in modern history.
  • US Relative Decline: From ~50% of world GDP (1945) to ~25% (2024) — the ‘hegemon’s dilemma’; overextension in Iraq/Afghanistan; 2008 financial crisis delegitimised US-led neoliberal model.
  • Russia’s Strategic Reassertion: 2008 Georgia War → 2014 Crimea → 2022 Ukraine — deliberate challenge to NATO/US-led security architecture.
  • Rise of Middle Powers: India, Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia — asserting autonomous foreign policy, hedging between blocs.
  • Institutional Delegitimisation: WTO Appellate Body crisis (2019), IMF quota inequities, UNSC reform paralysis — eroding US-built multilateral order.
  • Technology Diffusion: Digital/AI capabilities no longer US-exclusive; China leads in 5G, EVs, solar; India in digital public infrastructure.
🎓 Key Theorists for Competitive Exams
Amitav Acharya — ‘Multiplex World’: not chaotic multipolarity but overlapping regional orders. John Mearsheimer — Offensive Realism: rising powers inevitably challenge; instability guaranteed. Charles Kupchan — ‘No One’s World’: world without a dominant power demands managed multipolarity. G. John Ikenberry — Liberal Order resilience despite power shifts. Essential citations for UGC-NET, IFS, EU Concours essays.

Diagram — Global Power Transition: Unipolar to Multipolar

GLOBAL POWER TRANSITION: 1945 → 2000 → 2024 → PROJECTED 2035 1945–1990 BIPOLAR USA ~50% global GDP (1945) USSR Rival superpower Cold War Bipolarity NAM/Third World reaction 1991–2008 UNIPOLAR USA ~25% GDP · NATO peak Dollar hegemony · WTO Liberal International Order ‘End of History’ (Fukuyama) BRIC coined 2001 China WTO entry 2001 2008–2024 EMERGING MULTI USA China India Russia EU BRICS formed 2008 crisis · BRI · Quad Global South asserting de-dollarisation begins ~2035 PROJECTED STRUCTURED MULTI No single hegemon 3-5 major power centres US: Tech/Finance/Military China: Manufacturing/Belt&Road India: DPI/Democracy/Med EU: Regulation/Climate ASEAN/Gulf: Pivot states Dollar diluted; reformed multilateralism expected © IASNOVA.COM · Based on current structural trends; 2035 scenario is analytical projection

FIG — Global Power Architecture Evolution: Bipolar → Unipolar → Emerging Multipolar → Structured Multipolar | © IASNOVA.COM

© IASNOVA.COM

BRICS+ — Expansion, Architecture & Significance IASNOVA.COM

BRICS (originally Brazil–Russia–India–China–South Africa) has evolved from an investment thesis coined by Jim O’Neill (Goldman Sachs, 2001) into the most consequential multilateral platform for Global South political and economic coordination. The 2023 Johannesburg Declaration’s invitation to six new members — formalised as BRICS+ — marks the grouping’s transformation into a genuine geopolitical bloc.

BRICS Expansion: The 2023 Johannesburg Moment

9
Active BRICS+ members (post-Jan 2024)
~45%
Share of global population
~35%
Share of world GDP (PPP)
~44%
Share of global oil production (post-Saudi/UAE entry)
40+
Countries expressed interest in joining (2023–24)
2015
Year New Development Bank (NDB) became operational

New Members (from January 2024)

CountryStrategic SignificanceUS/Western Implication
🇸🇦 Saudi ArabiaWorld’s largest oil exporter; Petrodollar pivot; Arab world leadershipPotential ‘Petroyuan’; weakens US-Saudi oil-dollar axis established 1973
🇦🇪 UAEGlobal financial hub; trade gateway Asia-Africa-Europe; dirham internationalisationChallenges SWIFT dominance; Dubai as alternative financial centre
🇮🇷 IranOil/gas reserves; Strait of Hormuz control; anti-Western alignmentSanctions circumvention pathway; China-Russia backed inclusion over US objection
🇪🇬 EgyptSuez Canal; largest Arab nation; African pivotal stateSuez as leverage point; Egypt diversifying from IMF/US dependence
🇪🇹 EthiopiaSub-Saharan Africa’s second most populous nation; African Union HQAfrica’s symbolic representation; counters G7-Africa narratives
🇦🇷 ArgentinaInvited but declined (Milei government reversed acceptance, Jan 2024)Highlights internal heterogeneity and political volatility of BRICS ambition

Architecture of BRICS

  • Annual Summits: Rotating presidency; 2024 summit in Kazan (Russia) under Russian presidency; 2025 in Brazil.
  • New Development Bank (NDB): Shanghai-based; $50B initial capitalised; alternative to World Bank; Bangladesh, UAE, Uruguay, Egypt have joined; funds infrastructure in Global South.
  • Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA): $100B emergency currency swap mechanism — alternative to IMF emergency lending.
  • BRICS Payment System: Ongoing discussion on BRICS Currency/BRICS Bridge payment interoperability — replacing SWIFT for intra-BRICS trade.
  • BRICS Business Council, Think Tanks, Academic Network: Soft power infrastructure expanding.

Internal Contradictions & Limitations

⚡ Critical Analysis — High-Yield for IFS Mains & EU Concours
  • India–China Rivalry: Border disputes (Galwan 2020, Doklam 2017) create fundamental contradiction within BRICS — India insists on consensus not dominance by any single power.
  • China’s Hegemonic Ambition vs. Others’ Autonomy: Brazil, India, South Africa resist BRICS becoming a Chinese-led anti-Western bloc.
  • No Common Currency: BRICS currency proposals face insurmountable obstacles (different inflation rates, capital account policies, lack of political union).
  • NDB Limitations: Still uses USD for most lending; Russian sanctions post-2022 caused NDB funding crunch; not a true World Bank alternative yet.
  • Sovereignty Conflicts Among Members: Ethiopia-Egypt (Nile dam dispute); Saudi-Iran historical rivalry despite BRICS co-membership.

Diagram — BRICS+ Composition & Power Share

BRICS+ — MEMBER COMPOSITION & STRATEGIC PROFILE (2024) BRICS+ 9 Members 🇧🇷 BRAZIL GDP: $2.1T 🇷🇺 RUSSIA GDP: $2.2T 🇮🇳 INDIA GDP: $3.7T 🇨🇳 CHINA GDP: $17.9T 🇿🇦 S.AFRICA GDP: $0.4T 🇸🇦 KSA Oil Giant 🇦🇪 UAE Finance Hub 🇮🇷 IRAN Oil+Gas 🇪🇬 EGYPT Suez Canal 🇪🇹 ETH AU HQ Original 5 Members New Members (2024) GDP figures approximate (2024)

FIG — BRICS+ Architecture: Original 5 members (solid borders) + New 2024 members (dashed gold borders) | © IASNOVA.COM

© IASNOVA.COM

De-Dollarization — The Battle Over the Global Reserve Currency IASNOVA.COM

De-dollarization refers to the deliberate reduction of the US dollar’s role as the world’s dominant reserve currency, trade invoice currency, commodity pricing unit, and safe-haven asset. It is the most consequential economic dimension of the multipolar shift — directly challenging the structural power underpinning US global dominance since Bretton Woods (1944).

📌 Why Dollar Primacy Matters (Barry Eichengreen’s ‘Exorbitant Privilege’)
The US issues the world’s reserve currency, enabling it to: (1) borrow at lower interest rates than any other nation; (2) run persistent current account deficits without adjustment pressure; (3) weaponise the dollar via sanctions (SWIFT exclusion, asset freezes); (4) project geopolitical power through financial architecture. De-dollarization is fundamentally a challenge to this structural power.

Mechanisms of De-Dollarization

MechanismExamplesStatus / Impact
Bilateral Local Currency TradeIndia-Russia (Rupee-Ruble); China-Brazil (Yuan-Real); India-UAE (Rupee-Dirham)Growing; India settled Russian oil in rupees (2022–23); reduced dollar dependence in bilateral flows
Central Bank Reserve DiversificationChina reduced US Treasury holdings; Gulf states diversifying to gold, Yuan, EuroDollar share of global reserves: 71% (1999) → ~58% (2024) — slow but structural decline
Commodity Repricing‘Petroyuan’ — China-Saudi oil trades partially settled in Yuan; LNG contracts in non-dollarDollar’s share of global oil trade declining; 2022 Saudi-China deal landmark moment
Alternative Payment SystemsChina’s CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System); India’s UPI; Russia’s SPFS; BRICS Pay (proposed)CIPS growing (400+ banks); UPI internationalised to 6 countries; SWIFT dominance challenged
Gold AccumulationChina, Russia, India, Turkey, Poland buying gold at record pace; BRICS discussing gold-backed instrumentCentral bank gold buying: highest since 1967; de-facto hedge against dollar sanctions risk
IMF SDR Reform PushExpanding SDR basket; BRICS demand for greater IMF quota reform; NDB as alternative multilateral lenderIncremental; IMF still USD-dominated; quota reform stalled by US veto power (requiring 85% majority)

Why De-Dollarization is NOT Imminent — The Counter-Argument

⚖️ Balanced View — Critical for UPSC Essays, IFS, EU Concours
  • Network Effects: Dollar’s dominance is self-reinforcing — most global contracts, commodity pricing, and debt is denominated in dollars; switching costs are enormous.
  • No Credible Alternative: Yuan is not fully convertible (China maintains capital controls); Euro lacks a unified bond market; no BRICS currency exists.
  • US Institutional Depth: Deepest capital markets, rule of law, Treasury bonds remain the safest global asset class — no rival offers this.
  • Fragmented Alternatives: A multipolar currency world is more likely than a single rival replacing the dollar — meaning dollar dilution, not replacement.
The realistic trajectory is dollar ‘slowbalisation’ — gradual erosion of dominance, not collapse.

India’s Role in De-Dollarization

  • Rupee Trade Mechanism: RBI’s framework for international trade settlement in INR — activated for Russia oil purchases; expanded to 18+ countries’ banks.
  • UPI Internationalisation: Operational in Singapore, UAE, UK, France, Mauritius, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka — India exporting its digital payment infrastructure as soft power and de-dollarisation tool.
  • Gold Reserves: RBI added ~27 tonnes of gold in 2023–24; diversifying reserves away from dollar-denominated assets.
  • INR Bond Market: ‘Masala Bonds’ and inclusion in JPMorgan GBI-EM index (2024) — deepening INR-denominated global capital markets.

Diagram — De-Dollarization: Mechanisms & Implications

DE-DOLLARIZATION: FLOW OF CAUSATION & MECHANISM US Dollar Weaponisation SWIFT sanctions · Asset freezes · Russia 2022 BRICS+ Nations Seek Alternatives Risk of dollar dependence becomes existential LOCAL CURRENCY TRADE INR-Ruble Yuan-Real GOLD ACCUMULATION CB buying record highs since 1967 ALT PAYMENT SYSTEMS CIPS · UPI · SPFS BRICS Bridge COMMODITY REPRICING Petroyuan oil deals LNG in non-USD IMF/RESERVE DIVERSIFY USD share of reserves: 71%→58% OUTCOME: Dollar ‘Slowbalisation’ Dollar DILUTION (not replacement) → Multipolar Currency Landscape → Eroded US Sanction Power No single currency replaces USD in near term | Network effects & capital market depth protect dollar primacy © IASNOVA.COM

FIG — De-Dollarization Causal Flow: Triggers → Mechanisms → Outcomes | © IASNOVA.COM

© IASNOVA.COM

India’s Strategic Pivot — Voice of the Global South IASNOVA.COM

India’s foreign policy under the Modi doctrine (2014–present) represents a qualitative shift from the Nehruvian tradition of principled non-alignment toward Strategic Autonomy + Active Leadership. India now positions itself not merely as a developing country seeking concessions, but as the architect of a reformed, inclusive multilateral order — making it the natural leader of the Global South in the 21st century.

Five Pillars of India’s Global South Leadership

① Voice of the Global South Summits

India convened the 1st Voice of the Global South Summit (January 2023, virtual) with 125 countries participating — the largest such conclave ever. The 2nd Summit (November 2023) consolidated India’s leadership. Key themes: climate finance, debt relief, digital public infrastructure, food & energy security. This directly leveraged India’s G20 presidency agenda.

② G20 Presidency (2022–23): The African Union Entry

India’s most transformative G20 legacy: securing the African Union’s (AU) permanent membership in the G20 — giving Africa 55 nations a seat at the world’s premier economic governance table. This was a deliberate Global South solidarity move, elevating Africa from observer to full member. The New Delhi Declaration (Sept 2023) also embedded Global South priorities: debt restructuring, climate justice, DPI access.

③ Strategic Autonomy — Hedging Between Blocs

India refuses binary alignment. It is simultaneously: (a) a Quad member (India-US-Japan-Australia); (b) SCO member (China/Russia-dominated); (c) BRICS member; (d) I2U2 member (India-Israel-UAE-US); (e) Non-Aligned Movement participant; (f) ASEAN dialogue partner. This multi-alignment maximises India’s bargaining power and exemplifies the Global South’s rejection of Cold War-style bloc discipline.

Diagram — India’s Multi-Alignment Architecture

INDIA’S MULTI-ALIGNMENT: SIMULTANEOUS MEMBERSHIPS 🇮🇳 INDIA Strategic Autonomy QUAD US·Japan·Australia Security/Tech/AI BRICS+ China·Russia·SA Multipolar Order SCO China·Russia·CAsia Eurasian Security G20 Global Economic Governance I2U2 India·Israel UAE·US Voice of the Global South 125+ Countries © IASNOVA.COM

FIG — India’s Multi-Alignment Web: Simultaneous membership across competing blocs enables strategic autonomy | © IASNOVA.COM

④ Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) as Soft Power

India’s ‘India Stack’ — Aadhaar (biometric ID), UPI (payments), DigiLocker (documents), ONDC (commerce) — is being actively exported as a development model. The DPI Coalition launched at G20 aims to replicate India’s DPI approach in 50+ countries. This is India’s most innovative tool for Global South leadership — offering a democratic, open-source alternative to China’s surveillance-heavy digital infrastructure exports.

⑤ Development Finance Alternative

India has launched the India-UN Development Partnership Fund, bilateral development partnerships (ITEC — Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation: 160+ partner countries), Lines of Credit ($12.3B committed), and is positioning itself as an alternative to both Western conditionality-laden aid and China’s debt-trap diplomacy.

🎓 Analytical Depth for UPSC Mains Essay / IFS Paper
India’s Global South leadership faces a fundamental tension: It needs the West (technology transfers, FDI, defence equipment, QUAD security) but speaks for the Rest (de-dollarisation, climate justice, development finance reform). This is not hypocrisy — it is sophisticated multi-level diplomacy, but it creates credibility challenges. When India abstains on Ukraine votes at UNSC/UNGA, Western partners question its reliability; when India deepens Quad ties, BRICS partners question its commitment. Managing this tension is India’s central foreign policy challenge of the 2020s.

Key India–Global South Initiatives at a Glance

InitiativeYearSignificance
International Solar Alliance (ISA)2015120+ member countries; India-led climate financing for solar-rich Global South nations; alternative to fossil-fuel dependence
Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI)2019Funding resilient infrastructure in climate-vulnerable Global South — fills gap left by Western climate finance shortfalls
UPI Global Expansion2022–24Real-time payment system in 6+ countries; ‘Digital Rupee’ CBDC trials; reducing dollar in bilateral trade
AU-G20 Membership2023India’s flagship diplomatic achievement; permanent Africa seat in G20; landmark Global South solidarity moment
Voice of Global South Summits2023–24125+ countries; alternative to Western-dominated multilateral forums; India as convener and agenda-setter
India-Africa Forum Summits2008–present5 summits; $12.3B LOCs; scholarships, training; positioning India as Africa’s preferred development partner

© IASNOVA.COM

Africa’s Strategic Reorientation IASNOVA.COM

Africa is undergoing the most consequential strategic reorientation of any continent in the post-Cold War era. The continent — home to 1.4 billion people, the world’s youngest demographic bulge, and vast critical mineral reserves — is actively diversifying partnerships, asserting sovereignty over its resources, and demanding structural reform of the global economic order.

Key Drivers of Africa’s Reorientation

① Disillusionment with Western Conditionality

IMF structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) of the 1980s–90s are widely blamed for deindustrialisation and fiscal austerity that hollowed out public services. Western aid conditionality — tied to democracy standards, human rights frameworks, and neoliberal economic prescriptions — is increasingly resented as neo-colonial interference. African leaders increasingly prefer China’s ‘no-conditionality’ approach, even as they recognise its own risks.

② The Sahel Coup Belt: Security Partnership Shifts

2020–2023 witnessed a dramatic security realignment: Mali (2020, 2021), Guinea (2021), Burkina Faso (2022), Niger (2023), Gabon (2023), Senegal (contested, 2024) — a cascade of coups across the Sahel, all expelling French military forces (Operation Barkhane/Takuba) and in several cases inviting Wagner Group (now Africa Corps post-Prigozhin) Russian military contractors. This is not mere geopolitical opportunism — it reflects deep anti-French sentiment rooted in the CFA Franc monetary arrangement (14 African nations using a French-controlled currency).

📌 CFA Franc — High-Yield Concept
The CFA Franc (FCFA) is a colonial-era monetary arrangement tying 14 West and Central African nations’ currencies to the Euro (previously French Franc), with France guaranteeing convertibility in exchange for 50% of foreign reserves being deposited in the French Treasury. Critics call it neo-colonial monetary subjugation; supporters cite monetary stability. The West African push to replace CFA with ECO (ECOWAS single currency) represents Africa’s monetary sovereignty assertion — directly connected to de-dollarisation and Global South narratives.

③ Africa’s Critical Minerals Leverage

Africa holds: 70% of global cobalt (DRC), 90% of platinum group metals (South Africa, Zimbabwe), 60%+ of manganese, significant lithium, rare earth elements, uranium deposits. As the green energy transition accelerates demand for these minerals, Africa’s leverage is transforming. The African Union’s African Minerals Development Centre and initiatives to ban raw material exports (beneficiation requirement) reflect a new resource nationalism.

④ G20 African Union Membership (2023)

The AU’s entry into the G20 — championed by India — gives Africa a permanent, representative voice in global economic governance for the first time. Combined with the growing weight of South Africa (BRICS original member) and Ethiopia (BRICS+ new member), Africa’s multilateral footprint is expanding significantly.

⑤ Diversifying External Partners

PartnerAfrica Strategy2024 Status
🇨🇳 ChinaBelt & Road Initiative; Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC); infrastructure loans; arms salesLargest trade partner; debt sustainability concerns; ‘renegotiation pressure’ growing
🇷🇺 RussiaWagner/Africa Corps military presence; grain & fertilizer supply; arms; nuclear (Rosatom)Sahel military dominance; Russia-Africa Summit 2023 (50+ countries attended)
🇮🇳 IndiaITEC training; Lines of Credit; UPI; solar; pharma (‘pharmacy of the world’); diasporaFavoured partner for technology transfer; significant cultural goodwill; growing trade
🇹🇷 TurkeyAfrica summits; Bayraktar drones; Islamic diplomacy; trade corridorsEmerging arms supplier replacing Western suppliers in several markets
🇦🇪 UAE & GulfPorts (DP World); agricultural land investment; sovereign wealth funds; financial servicesMost active newcomer; critical partnership for East Africa (Horn, Kenya, Tanzania)

Africa’s Own Institutional Assertion

  • African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA, 2021): 54 signatories; world’s largest free trade area by number of countries; aims to double intra-African trade (currently only ~15% of total trade vs ~60% in Europe).
  • Agenda 2063: AU’s 50-year development blueprint; demands sovereign industrialisation, value addition, diversification.
  • African Pharmaceutical Agency: Reducing dependence on imported medicines; COVID-19 exposed dangerous dependency.
  • African Peace & Security Architecture (APSA): African-led conflict resolution; reducing reliance on external peacekeeping forces.

© IASNOVA.COM

Global South vs G7 — Structural Tension in the Global Order IASNOVA.COM

The G7 (US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Japan) represents the post-WWII Western liberal order’s core — a club of advanced industrial democracies that has set global economic and political norms since Bretton Woods. The Global South’s rising assertiveness represents a direct challenge to G7 norm-setting dominance, creating the central structural tension of 21st-century international relations.

Dimension G7 Position Global South Position
Global GovernanceDefend existing multilateral architecture (UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank, ICC)Reform or replace Western-dominated institutions; demand IMF quota reform, UNSC expansion
Democracy & Human RightsUniversal norms; conditionality for aid/trade; ‘Liberal Internationalism’Sovereignty principle; non-interference; ‘developmental authoritarianism’ acceptable; cultural relativism in rights
Russia-Ukraine WarUnambiguous condemnation; sanctions on Russia; weapons supply to UkraineMixed; majority abstained/voted against UNGA resolutions; prioritise sovereignty but oppose blank-cheque arms supply; ceasefire diplomacy
Climate FinanceCommitted $100B/year (Copenhagen 2009 promise — chronically unmet); technology transfer on commercial termsDemand fulfillment of $100B; ‘Loss & Damage’ fund (agreed COP27); concessional technology transfer; historical responsibility for emissions
Trade RulesFree trade orthodoxy; WTO dispute settlement; IP protection (TRIPS)Policy space for industrial policy; TRIPS waiver for medicines/vaccines; South-South trade preferences; AfCFTA
Debt ArchitectureParis Club creditors; IMF structural adjustment conditionalityG20 Common Framework (slow/inadequate); debt cancellation demands; China as parallel creditor complicates negotiations
Digital GovernanceOpen internet; data privacy standards (GDPR-style); Western tech platform dominanceDigital sovereignty; data localisation; AI governance inclusion; demand for DPI models (India’s UPI alternative to Meta Pay/WeChat)
Energy Transition‘Phase out all fossil fuels’ (COP28 language); accelerate renewablesRight to development using all energy sources; ‘just transition’ with financing; Global South cannot afford Western transition speed on current finance
🔍 Analytical Point — Beyond Binary (For UPSC Essays & IFS Mains)
The G7 vs Global South framing is real but can be over-simplified. Key nuances: (1) India sits in both camps — Quad security alignment + Global South economic demands; (2) China exploits Global South solidarity while being a UNSC P5 power and G20 member; (3) Several Global South nations (Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore) have higher per-capita incomes than some G7 members; (4) On Ukraine, several Global South nations (Baltics, Poland, Baltic Africans) backed Western position. The dichotomy is politically instrumentalised, not geographically absolute.

© IASNOVA.COM

Key Concepts & Terms Master Glossary IASNOVA.COM

TermDefinition & Exam Relevance
Exorbitant PrivilegeCoined by French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing; refers to the unfair advantage the US gains from its currency being the world’s reserve currency — ability to borrow cheaply, run deficits, and sanction others. Core concept in de-dollarisation debates. [UPSC GS-2, IFS, EU Concours]
Strategic AutonomyForeign policy doctrine prioritising independent decision-making over bloc alignment; associated with Nehruvian NAM heritage, now reinterpreted by India as ‘multi-alignment’ — maintaining partnerships across rival blocs simultaneously. [UPSC GS-2, UGC-NET, IFS]
Multiplex WorldAmitav Acharya’s concept: a world of multiple overlapping regional orders, civilisational identities, and institutional frameworks — neither US-led nor Chinese-led, but genuinely plural. More optimistic than Mearsheimer’s conflict prediction. [UGC-NET, IFS, EU Concours]
Washington Consensus10-point neoliberal policy prescription (fiscal discipline, privatisation, trade liberalisation, deregulation) promoted by IMF/World Bank for developing nations; blamed by Global South for 1980s–90s development failures. ‘Beijing Consensus’ is its contested alternative. [UPSC, GRE, EU Concours]
Bandung SpiritThe ethos of Afro-Asian solidarity, anti-colonialism, and sovereign equality that emerged from the 1955 Bandung Conference. Frequently invoked in Global South diplomatic discourse. [UPSC, UGC-NET]
South-South Cooperation (SSC)Technical, economic, and political cooperation among developing nations themselves — bypassing traditional North-South aid paradigm. India’s ITEC, China’s FOCAC, Brazil’s agricultural cooperation are examples. [UPSC, UGC-NET, GRE]
Dependency TheoryStructuralist theory (Frank, Cardoso, Wallerstein) arguing Global South underdevelopment is a structural result of its incorporation into the capitalist world-system as raw material exporters and cheap labour pools for the ‘core’ (Global North). [UGC-NET Political Science essential]
Petrodollar SystemPost-1973 arrangement where oil-exporting nations (especially Saudi Arabia) price and receive payment for oil exclusively in US dollars, recycling surpluses into US Treasuries — sustaining dollar hegemony. Erosion of this system = core de-dollarisation dynamic. [UPSC, IFS, GRE]
Debt Trap DiplomacyTheory that China extends unsustainable loans to developing nations, then uses debt default as leverage to seize strategic assets (e.g., Hambantota Port, Sri Lanka). Contested in academic literature (Brautigam challenges the evidence) but politically influential. [UPSC, IFS, US FSOT]
Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)Interoperable, open-source digital platforms built as public goods (ID, payments, data-exchange layers). India’s ‘India Stack’ (Aadhaar + UPI + ONDC) is the global exemplar; being promoted as a democratic alternative to Big Tech-dominated and state-surveillance models. [UPSC GS-2 Science & Tech, IFS]
Loss & Damage (L&D)Climate finance mechanism (agreed COP27, 2022) to compensate developing nations for irreversible climate change impacts — floods, sea-level rise — caused historically by Global North emissions. Operationalised at COP28 (2023). Key climate justice demand of Global South. [UPSC, GRE, EU Concours]
Multipolarity vs MultilateralismCritical distinction: Multipolarity = dispersion of power among multiple great powers; Multilateralism = institutional cooperation among many states on rules. They can coexist (reformed multilateralism in a multipolar world) or conflict (competing power centres undermine multilateral rules). [IFS, EU Concours, GRE]

© IASNOVA.COM

Critical Events Timeline — Global South & Multipolarity IASNOVA.COM

1955
Bandung Conference — 29 Afro-Asian nations assert collective solidarity; birth of Third World non-alignment identity; precursor to NAM.
1961
Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Founded — Belgrade; Nehru, Nasser, Tito as founders; 120+ members today; India’s foundational foreign policy legacy.
1974
New International Economic Order (NIEO) Declaration — UN General Assembly; Global South demands restructuring of global trade, finance, and technology transfer; prescient forerunner of today’s reform agenda.
2001
‘BRIC’ Concept Coined by Jim O’Neill (Goldman Sachs); China joins WTO (December) — both signals of the emerging multipolar shift.
2008
BRIC First Summit (Yekaterinburg, Russia); Global Financial Crisis — delegitimises US-led neoliberal model; G20 replaces G8 as premier economic forum; China stimulus saves global economy.
2010
South Africa joins BRICS — first African member; BRICS becomes symbolically continental not just BRIC-4 club.
2013
China launches Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) — $1T+ infrastructure lending across 150+ countries; redefines China-Global South relations; triggers Western counter-initiatives (PGII, IMEC).
2015
New Development Bank (NDB) & AIIB operational — BRICS-backed alternatives to World Bank; China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank; first genuine institutional challenge to Bretton Woods architecture.
2022
Russia’s Ukraine Invasion & Western SWIFT Sanctions — SWIFT exclusion of Russia triggers global concern about dollar weaponisation; catalyses de-dollarisation drive; most BRICS/Global South nations abstain on UNGA censure resolutions.
Jan 2023
India’s Voice of the Global South Summit — 125 nations; India consolidates leadership of the Global South ahead of G20 Presidency.
Sept 2023
G20 New Delhi Summit — African Union admitted as permanent G20 member; New Delhi Declaration reflects Global South priorities; India’s landmark diplomatic achievement.
Aug 2023
BRICS Johannesburg Summit — Invitation to 6 new members (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Argentina); BRICS+ born; most significant expansion in grouping’s history.
Jan 2024
BRICS+ formally enlarged — Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia join; Argentina declines (Milei government); 9-member BRICS+ becomes reality. Saudi Arabia begins partial oil trade in Yuan.
Oct 2024
BRICS Kazan Summit (Russia) — Russia presidency; 30+ nations attend; ‘BRICS Partner Country’ status created; ~13 new partner countries admitted; debate on BRICS currency/payment system continues.
2025
Brazil BRICS Presidency — Lula’s Brazil chairs BRICS; focuses on climate, hunger, AI governance, development finance reform; continues Global South coalition-building.

© IASNOVA.COM

Exam Corner — Previous Year Questions & Practice IASNOVA.COM

📝
UPSC Civil Services (CSE/IFS) — India
UPSC MAINS GS-2 | 2023
“India is increasingly being seen as the voice of the Global South. Critically examine the basis for this claim and the challenges India faces in fulfilling this role.” [15 Marks]
UPSC MAINS GS-2 | 2022
“Explain the significance of BRICS as a grouping in the context of an emerging multipolar world order. What are the key challenges it faces?” [15 Marks]
UPSC MAINS GS-2 | 2023
“Discuss India’s contribution to the New Development Bank (NDB) and its implications for reforming global financial governance.” [10 Marks]
UPSC MAINS ESSAY | 2022
“The Global South is not merely a geographical concept but a political and civilisational project.” — Analyse. [Essay Paper — 250 Marks]
UPSC PRELIMS | 2023
Consider the following statements about BRICS: (1) NDB is headquartered in Beijing; (2) CRA is a $100B mechanism; (3) BRICS holds annual summits on a rotation basis. Which are correct? [MCQ]
IFS MAINS (IR PAPER) | 2022
“De-dollarisation is more a geopolitical aspiration than a near-term economic reality. Do you agree? Substantiate your answer with reference to the structural constraints facing BRICS currencies.” [20 Marks]

© IASNOVA.COM

🎓
UGC-NET Political Science — India
UGC-NET POLITICAL SCIENCE | 2023 (Paper II)
“Match the following: Bandung Conference–NAM formation; G77–1964; NIEO–1974; BRICS–2009.” [MCQ — Matching Type]
UGC-NET | 2022 (Paper II)
“Dependency Theory as articulated by Wallerstein posits that: (a) Core-Periphery exploitation perpetuates underdevelopment; (b) Development is inevitable; (c) Trade is always beneficial; (d) Geography determines development.” [MCQ]
UGC-NET | 2023
“Which of the following is NOT a mechanism of de-dollarisation? (a) Gold accumulation; (b) SWIFT strengthening; (c) Bilateral local currency trade; (d) CIPS expansion.” [MCQ]

© IASNOVA.COM

🌍
USA — GRE Political Science & US Foreign Service Officer Test (FSOT)
US FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER TEST (FSOT) — SAMPLE
“Which best describes the ‘exorbitant privilege’ associated with the US dollar as the global reserve currency?” [MCQ — Knowledge Test]
GRE POLITICAL SCIENCE SUBJECT TEST — CONCEPT
“In IR theory, Amitav Acharya’s concept of ‘Multiplex World’ most closely aligns with: (a) Liberal Institutionalism; (b) Post-Western International Order; (c) Neo-realist Balance of Power; (d) Constructivist Identity Politics.” [MCQ]
AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT — SHORT ANSWER
“Identify two structural factors that have contributed to the rise of the Global South as a force in international relations since 2008, providing a specific example for each factor.”

© IASNOVA.COM

🇪🇺
Europe — EU Concours (EPSO), FCDO UK, Sciences Po
EU CONCOURS (EPSO AD EXTERNAL RELATIONS) — ESSAY TYPE
“The European Union faces a dilemma in engaging with the Global South: its insistence on conditionality and human rights standards is increasingly seen as neo-colonial by partner nations, while abandoning these standards undermines its normative foreign policy identity. How should the EU recalibrate its development partnership approach?”
FCDO UK FAST STREAM — POLICY ANALYSIS EXERCISE
“Assess the implications of African nations diversifying security partnerships away from France and toward Russia and private military contractors for UK foreign policy interests in Sub-Saharan Africa.”
SCIENCES PO PARIS — ENTRANCE ESSAY
“Est-il exact de parler d’un ‘Sud Global’ comme d’un acteur cohérent des relations internationales?” [Is it accurate to speak of a ‘Global South’ as a coherent actor in international relations?]

© IASNOVA.COM

Mnemonics, Memory Aids & Recall Frameworks IASNOVA.COM

🧠 MNEMONIC 1 — BRICS+ New Members: “SAISE” (or “Saudi Eagles In Egypt & Ethiopia”)
S·A·I·E·E
  • S — Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 (Oil · Petrodollar pivot)
  • A — UAE (Abu Dhabi/Dubai) 🇦🇪 (Finance hub)
  • I — Iran 🇮🇷 (Anti-Western anchor; oil/gas)
  • E — Egypt 🇪🇬 (Suez Canal; Arab world)
  • E — Ethiopia 🇪🇹 (African Union HQ; symbolic Africa entry)

Remember: Argentina was invited but declined (Milei flip) — the 6th invite that didn’t become a 6th member.

🧠 MNEMONIC 2 — De-Dollarization Mechanisms: “LGCGI” = “Large Gold Coins Generate Independence”
L·G·C·G·I
  • L — Local Currency Trade (Rupee-Ruble, Yuan-Real)
  • G — Gold Accumulation (record central bank buying)
  • C — Commodity Repricing (Petroyuan, LNG in non-USD)
  • G — GIPA: Global Alternative Payment Systems (CIPS, UPI, SPFS, BRICS Pay)
  • I — IMF/Reserve Diversification (USD share 71%→58%)
🧠 MNEMONIC 3 — India’s Multi-Alignment Groups: “QBSIG-V”
Q·B·S·I·G·V
  • Q — Quad (US, Japan, Australia, India)
  • B — BRICS+ (Russia, China, SA + new members)
  • S — SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation)
  • I — I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE, US)
  • G — G20 (Global Economic Governance)
  • V — Voice of the Global South (125+ nations)
🧠 MNEMONIC 4 — Africa’s Strategic Drivers: “CMGDD”
C·M·G·D·D
  • C — CFA Franc resentment (monetary neo-colonialism; 14 nations)
  • M — Minerals leverage (70% cobalt, 90% PGMs, lithium, REEs)
  • G — G20 AU Membership (India’s gift; structural shift)
  • D — Diversification of partners (China, Russia, India, Turkey, Gulf)
  • D — Disillusionment with Western conditionality (SAPs legacy)

Quick-Fire Recall: Key Numbers to Remember

9
BRICS+ members (2024)
125+
Countries at Voice of Global South Summit (Jan 2023)
58%
USD share of global reserves (2024; down from 71% in 1999)
$100B
BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) size
54
AfCFTA signatory countries (world’s largest FTA by nations)
14
African nations in CFA Franc zone
70%
Africa’s share of global cobalt (DRC)
40+
Countries expressed interest in joining BRICS+ (2023–24)

© IASNOVA.COM

Quick Revision Snapshot — Last-Day Prep IASNOVA.COM

⏱️ 15-Minute Master Summary
Global South = political solidarity category (not just geography); born at Bandung 1955, formalised through NAM, G77, NIEO. Multipolarity = multiple power centres replacing US unipolarity; driven by China’s rise, US relative decline, middle power assertiveness. BRICS+ = 9 members (original 5 + Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia); has NDB + CRA; no common currency yet. De-dollarization = mechanisms: local currency trade, gold accumulation, alt payment systems (CIPS/UPI), commodity repricing, reserve diversification; dollar declining but NOT being replaced soon. India’s Pivot = multi-alignment + Voice of Global South Summits + G20 (AU membership) + DPI export + strategic autonomy. Africa’s Reorientation = CFA Franc revolt, Sahel coup belt (expelling France), minerals leverage, AfCFTA, diversified partners. GS vs G7 = clash over governance reform, conditionality, climate finance, trade rules, Ukraine, digital order.
🏛️ Key Institutions
  • BRICS+ (9 members, 2024)
  • New Development Bank (NDB, Shanghai)
  • G77 + China (134 nations)
  • Non-Aligned Movement (120+ nations)
  • African Union (55 members; G20 2023)
  • AfCFTA (54 signatories)
  • AIIB (China-led, 105 members)
  • SCO (Eurasia security+economic)
🔑 Key Theories
  • Dependency Theory (Frank, Wallerstein)
  • Multiplex World (Acharya)
  • Offensive Realism (Mearsheimer)
  • Liberal Order (Ikenberry)
  • Exorbitant Privilege (Eichengreen)
  • Washington Consensus vs Beijing Consensus
  • Strategic Autonomy (Nehru→Modi)
  • South-South Cooperation (SSC)
📅 Critical Dates
  • 1955: Bandung Conference
  • 1961: NAM founded
  • 1974: NIEO Declaration
  • 2001: BRIC coined; China WTO
  • 2009: BRIC First Summit
  • 2023: BRICS Johannesburg; G20 AU
  • 2024: BRICS+ 9 members formed
  • 2024: JPMorgan India GBI-EM inclusion
🌐 India’s Initiatives
  • International Solar Alliance (ISA, 2015)
  • CDRI (2019)
  • India Stack / DPI Coalition
  • UPI in 6+ countries
  • ITEC (160+ partner nations)
  • LOCs: $12.3B committed
  • Voice of Global South Summits
  • G20 AU Permanent Membership
🌍 Africa Fast Facts
  • 70% global cobalt: DRC
  • 90% PGMs: South Africa/Zimbabwe
  • 14 nations: CFA Franc zone
  • 54 AfCFTA signatories
  • AU in G20: Sept 2023 (India’s gift)
  • Wagner in Sahel: post-2020 coups
  • Ethiopia in BRICS+ (Jan 2024)
  • Egypt: Suez + BRICS+ 2024
⚖️ G7 vs Global South
  • Ukraine: G7 condemns; GS abstains
  • Climate: $100B pledge unmet; L&D
  • Trade: free trade vs policy space
  • Debt: Paris Club vs Common Framework
  • Governance: defend IMF vs reform IMF
  • Digital: open internet vs sovereignty
  • China: G7 sees threat; GS sees partner
  • India: straddles both camps

Tag Index — Topic Cross-Reference

UPSC GS-2 UPSC Essay IFS IR Paper UGC-NET Pol.Sci UPPSC BPSC GRE Pol.Sci US FSOT AP Comp.Gov EU Concours AD FCDO UK Sciences Po Multipolarity BRICS+ De-Dollarization India Pivot Africa Reorientation G7 vs Global South Strategic Autonomy NDB CFA Franc Exorbitant Privilege AfCFTA Voice of Global South

© IASNOVA.COM

Frequently Asked Questions IASNOVA.COM

What is the Global South and why is it significant for UPSC and competitive exams?
The Global South refers broadly to nations in Africa, Latin America, Asia, and Oceania that share experiences of colonialism and post-colonial marginalisation in global governance. For UPSC GS-2, it is significant because it frames India’s foreign policy (India as Voice of Global South), ties into BRICS+ debates, de-dollarisation questions, India-Africa relations, and the demand for multilateral reform — all regular Mains themes. UGC-NET Political Science Paper II routinely tests core concepts like Dependency Theory, NAM, G77, and NIEO.
What is BRICS+ and which new members joined in 2024?
BRICS+ is the expanded version of BRICS after the 2023 Johannesburg Summit invited six new members. From January 2024, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Egypt, and Ethiopia formally joined (Argentina was invited but declined after Milei took power). The grouping now has 9 active members and represents approximately 45% of global population and ~35% of world GDP (PPP). In October 2024, the Kazan Summit created a new ‘BRICS Partner Country’ status, with approximately 13 more nations admitted as partners.
What is de-dollarisation and what are its implications for global governance?
De-dollarisation is the process by which countries reduce reliance on the US dollar in international trade, reserves, and financial transactions. Its key mechanisms include bilateral trade in local currencies, gold accumulation, alternative payment systems (CIPS, UPI, SPFS), commodity repricing (Petroyuan), and IMF reserve diversification. Its implications: erodes US ‘exorbitant privilege’, weakens US sanction power, and challenges Bretton Woods architecture. However, the dollar remains dominant — its share of global reserves has declined from ~71% (1999) to ~58% (2024), but no credible single alternative exists, making ‘dollar dilution’ more likely than ‘dollar replacement.’
How has India’s foreign policy changed in the context of the Global South?
India has shifted from passive non-alignment to active multi-alignment — simultaneously engaging Quad (security), BRICS+ (economic multipolarity), SCO (Eurasia), I2U2 (tech/energy), G20 (governance), and Voice of the Global South. India’s most distinctive contributions: hosting Voice of the Global South Summits (125+ nations), securing the AU’s G20 permanent membership (India’s G20 presidency, Sept 2023), exporting Digital Public Infrastructure (UPI, Aadhaar model) to Global South nations, and positioning itself as a democratic, non-conditionality development alternative to China. The core tension is India’s need for Western partnerships (tech, defence, Quad) vs its claim to Global South leadership.
What is Africa’s strategic reorientation and what are its key drivers?
Africa’s reorientation involves reducing dependence on Western powers and diversifying partnerships toward China, Russia, India, Gulf states, and Turkey. Key drivers: (1) Disillusionment with IMF structural adjustment conditionality; (2) CFA Franc resentment (14 nations in French monetary zone); (3) Sahel coup belt (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Gabon expelling French forces, inviting Wagner/Russia); (4) Critical minerals leverage (70% cobalt, 90% PGMs); (5) AU-G20 membership assertion. The AfCFTA (54 signatories) represents Africa’s push for internal economic integration independent of external powers.
Which specific competitive exams in India, USA, and Europe test Global South topics?
India: UPSC Civil Services Exam (CSE) — GS-2, Essay Paper; IFS (Indian Foreign Service); UGC-NET Political Science (Paper II); UPPSC, BPSC, JPSC, MPPSC (State PSCs — International Relations sections). USA: US Foreign Service Officer Test (FSOT) — biographic and knowledge sections; GRE Political Science Subject Test; AP Comparative Government and Politics exam; CIA/DIA analyst recruitment. Europe: EU Concours (EPSO) — particularly AD-grade External Relations, Trade, Development profiles; FCDO UK Fast Stream; Sciences Po Paris entrance; French Quai d’Orsay diplomatic exam; ENA-equivalent national diplomatic academies. Global: UN Junior Professional Officer (JPO) exams; World Bank/IMF entry-level analyst tests.
Is a BRICS common currency feasible? What should I write in UPSC/IFS answers?
A BRICS common currency is not feasible in the near term. For exam answers, state: (1) Optimum Currency Area conditions (Mundell) not met — different inflation rates, capital account regimes, economic structures; (2) India and Brazil resist yuan dominance; (3) Russia under sanctions is financially isolated; (4) No political union to back monetary union; (5) NDB still primarily lends in USD. The realistic trajectory is a BRICS payment interoperability system (like BRICS Bridge) rather than a common currency. A good UPSC/IFS answer acknowledges the aspiration, explains structural constraints, and notes the ‘dollar dilution’ reality vs ‘dollar replacement’ fantasy. This demonstrates nuanced analytical thinking.
What is the CFA Franc and why does it matter for Global South analysis?
The CFA Franc (FCFA) is used by 14 West and Central African nations (two zones: WAEMU and CEMAC). It was pegged to the French Franc, now to the Euro, with France guaranteeing convertibility in exchange for 50% of member nations’ foreign reserves being deposited in the French Treasury. Critics see it as monetary neo-colonialism — limiting these nations’ monetary sovereignty and forcing deflationary policies. The Sahel coups (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger) were partly fuelled by CFA resentment. The ECOWAS push for a single ‘ECO’ currency represents Africa’s monetary sovereignty assertion. This is high-yield content for EU Concours (Africa development) and UPSC/IFS answers on Africa’s reorientation.

© IASNOVA.COM

Recommended Readings & Sources IASNOVA.COM

For deeper preparation in advanced exams (IFS, EU Concours, GRE):

📖 Books
  • Amitav Acharya — The End of the American World Order
  • Barry Eichengreen — Exorbitant Privilege
  • Deborah Brautigam — The Dragon’s Gift
  • Parag Khanna — The Future is Asian
  • C. Raja Mohan — Samudra Manthan
📰 Journals & Think Tanks
  • Third World Quarterly (journal)
  • Foreign Affairs — Global South issues
  • ORF (Observer Research Foundation)
  • Chatham House (Africa/BRICS)
  • Brookings Africa Growth Initiative
🌐 Official Sources
  • MEA India — Joint Statements/Communiques
  • BRICS.info — Summit Declarations
  • African Union — Agenda 2063 docs
  • IMF World Economic Outlook
  • UN DESA — World Economic Situation

© IASNOVA.COM

IASNOVA.COM — International Relations Exam Series

Prepared by the IASNOVA Editorial Team. For UPSC CSE · IFS · UGC-NET · UPPSC · BPSC · GRE · US FSOT · EU Concours · FCDO UK · Sciences Po & all competitive examinations covering International Relations.

Share this post:

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.