Rise of the Global South & Multipolarity
BRICS+, De-Dollarization, India’s Pivot, Africa’s Strategic Reorientation & Global South vs G7 — Academic depth with visual clarity for competitive exam excellence.
© IASNOVA.COM — Authorised Study Resource
📋 Table of Contents IASNOVA.COM
01 · Foundation Concept
What is the Global South? IASNOVA.COM
The term ‘Global South’ transcends simple geography. It denotes a political, economic, and historical condition — broadly encompassing nations across Africa, Latin America, Asia, and parts of Oceania that share experiences of colonialism, post-colonial underdevelopment, structural marginalisation in global governance institutions (IMF, World Bank, UNSC), and ongoing demands for equitable international order reform.
Theoretical Roots
- Bandung Conference (1955): First assertion of Afro-Asian solidarity — birth of Third World identity politics.
- Non-Aligned Movement (NAM, 1961): Formal institutionalisation of neutrality between Cold War blocs; foundational to Global South solidarity.
- G77 (1964): Multilateral coalition for collective economic bargaining at the UN — still the largest intergovernmental organisation of developing nations (134+ members today).
- New International Economic Order (NIEO, 1974): UN Declaration demanding structural reform of global trade and finance — a forerunner of today’s de-dollarisation and IMF reform debates.
- Dependency Theory (Cardoso, Frank, Wallerstein): Academic framework explaining Global South underdevelopment as structural outcome of core-periphery exploitation.
- Post-Cold War Reconceptualisation: After 1991, ‘Third World’ ceded to ‘Global South’ — a more agency-centred framing emphasising collective voice, not mere victimhood.
Who Comprises the Global South?
© IASNOVA.COM
02 · IR Theory
Theory of Multipolarity IASNOVA.COM
Multipolarity describes a global power distribution characterised by multiple centres of influence, contrasted with bipolarity (Cold War: US vs USSR) and unipolarity (post-1991: US-led ‘unipolar moment’). The 21st century’s structural shift toward multipolarity is the organising principle behind the Global South’s rise.
Polarity Typology at a Glance
| Polarity Type | Era | Power Structure | Key Stability Theory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multipolar | Pre-1914 | 5+ great powers (UK, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia) | Balance of Power (Kissinger) |
| Bipolar | 1947–1991 | US vs USSR + aligned blocs | Waltz: Bipolar most stable; MAD deterrence |
| Unipolar | 1991–~2008 | US ‘hyperpower’ dominance | Krauthammer’s ‘Unipolar Moment’; Ikenberry’s Liberal Order |
| Emerging Multipolar | 2008–present | US + China + Russia + EU + India + Regional Powers | Contested: Mearsheimer (instability) vs Acharya (multiplex world) |
Why Now? — Structural Drivers of Multipolarity
- China’s Rise: From 3.6% of world GDP (1990) to ~18% (2024, PPP) — the most consequential redistribution of economic power in modern history.
- US Relative Decline: From ~50% of world GDP (1945) to ~25% (2024) — the ‘hegemon’s dilemma’; overextension in Iraq/Afghanistan; 2008 financial crisis delegitimised US-led neoliberal model.
- Russia’s Strategic Reassertion: 2008 Georgia War → 2014 Crimea → 2022 Ukraine — deliberate challenge to NATO/US-led security architecture.
- Rise of Middle Powers: India, Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia — asserting autonomous foreign policy, hedging between blocs.
- Institutional Delegitimisation: WTO Appellate Body crisis (2019), IMF quota inequities, UNSC reform paralysis — eroding US-built multilateral order.
- Technology Diffusion: Digital/AI capabilities no longer US-exclusive; China leads in 5G, EVs, solar; India in digital public infrastructure.
Diagram — Global Power Transition: Unipolar to Multipolar
FIG — Global Power Architecture Evolution: Bipolar → Unipolar → Emerging Multipolar → Structured Multipolar | © IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
03 · BRICS+
BRICS+ — Expansion, Architecture & Significance IASNOVA.COM
BRICS (originally Brazil–Russia–India–China–South Africa) has evolved from an investment thesis coined by Jim O’Neill (Goldman Sachs, 2001) into the most consequential multilateral platform for Global South political and economic coordination. The 2023 Johannesburg Declaration’s invitation to six new members — formalised as BRICS+ — marks the grouping’s transformation into a genuine geopolitical bloc.
BRICS Expansion: The 2023 Johannesburg Moment
New Members (from January 2024)
| Country | Strategic Significance | US/Western Implication |
|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | World’s largest oil exporter; Petrodollar pivot; Arab world leadership | Potential ‘Petroyuan’; weakens US-Saudi oil-dollar axis established 1973 |
| 🇦🇪 UAE | Global financial hub; trade gateway Asia-Africa-Europe; dirham internationalisation | Challenges SWIFT dominance; Dubai as alternative financial centre |
| 🇮🇷 Iran | Oil/gas reserves; Strait of Hormuz control; anti-Western alignment | Sanctions circumvention pathway; China-Russia backed inclusion over US objection |
| 🇪🇬 Egypt | Suez Canal; largest Arab nation; African pivotal state | Suez as leverage point; Egypt diversifying from IMF/US dependence |
| 🇪🇹 Ethiopia | Sub-Saharan Africa’s second most populous nation; African Union HQ | Africa’s symbolic representation; counters G7-Africa narratives |
| 🇦🇷 Argentina | Invited but declined (Milei government reversed acceptance, Jan 2024) | Highlights internal heterogeneity and political volatility of BRICS ambition |
Architecture of BRICS
- Annual Summits: Rotating presidency; 2024 summit in Kazan (Russia) under Russian presidency; 2025 in Brazil.
- New Development Bank (NDB): Shanghai-based; $50B initial capitalised; alternative to World Bank; Bangladesh, UAE, Uruguay, Egypt have joined; funds infrastructure in Global South.
- Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA): $100B emergency currency swap mechanism — alternative to IMF emergency lending.
- BRICS Payment System: Ongoing discussion on BRICS Currency/BRICS Bridge payment interoperability — replacing SWIFT for intra-BRICS trade.
- BRICS Business Council, Think Tanks, Academic Network: Soft power infrastructure expanding.
Internal Contradictions & Limitations
- India–China Rivalry: Border disputes (Galwan 2020, Doklam 2017) create fundamental contradiction within BRICS — India insists on consensus not dominance by any single power.
- China’s Hegemonic Ambition vs. Others’ Autonomy: Brazil, India, South Africa resist BRICS becoming a Chinese-led anti-Western bloc.
- No Common Currency: BRICS currency proposals face insurmountable obstacles (different inflation rates, capital account policies, lack of political union).
- NDB Limitations: Still uses USD for most lending; Russian sanctions post-2022 caused NDB funding crunch; not a true World Bank alternative yet.
- Sovereignty Conflicts Among Members: Ethiopia-Egypt (Nile dam dispute); Saudi-Iran historical rivalry despite BRICS co-membership.
Diagram — BRICS+ Composition & Power Share
FIG — BRICS+ Architecture: Original 5 members (solid borders) + New 2024 members (dashed gold borders) | © IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
04 · International Political Economy
De-Dollarization — The Battle Over the Global Reserve Currency IASNOVA.COM
De-dollarization refers to the deliberate reduction of the US dollar’s role as the world’s dominant reserve currency, trade invoice currency, commodity pricing unit, and safe-haven asset. It is the most consequential economic dimension of the multipolar shift — directly challenging the structural power underpinning US global dominance since Bretton Woods (1944).
Mechanisms of De-Dollarization
| Mechanism | Examples | Status / Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral Local Currency Trade | India-Russia (Rupee-Ruble); China-Brazil (Yuan-Real); India-UAE (Rupee-Dirham) | Growing; India settled Russian oil in rupees (2022–23); reduced dollar dependence in bilateral flows |
| Central Bank Reserve Diversification | China reduced US Treasury holdings; Gulf states diversifying to gold, Yuan, Euro | Dollar share of global reserves: 71% (1999) → ~58% (2024) — slow but structural decline |
| Commodity Repricing | ‘Petroyuan’ — China-Saudi oil trades partially settled in Yuan; LNG contracts in non-dollar | Dollar’s share of global oil trade declining; 2022 Saudi-China deal landmark moment |
| Alternative Payment Systems | China’s CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System); India’s UPI; Russia’s SPFS; BRICS Pay (proposed) | CIPS growing (400+ banks); UPI internationalised to 6 countries; SWIFT dominance challenged |
| Gold Accumulation | China, Russia, India, Turkey, Poland buying gold at record pace; BRICS discussing gold-backed instrument | Central bank gold buying: highest since 1967; de-facto hedge against dollar sanctions risk |
| IMF SDR Reform Push | Expanding SDR basket; BRICS demand for greater IMF quota reform; NDB as alternative multilateral lender | Incremental; IMF still USD-dominated; quota reform stalled by US veto power (requiring 85% majority) |
Why De-Dollarization is NOT Imminent — The Counter-Argument
- Network Effects: Dollar’s dominance is self-reinforcing — most global contracts, commodity pricing, and debt is denominated in dollars; switching costs are enormous.
- No Credible Alternative: Yuan is not fully convertible (China maintains capital controls); Euro lacks a unified bond market; no BRICS currency exists.
- US Institutional Depth: Deepest capital markets, rule of law, Treasury bonds remain the safest global asset class — no rival offers this.
- Fragmented Alternatives: A multipolar currency world is more likely than a single rival replacing the dollar — meaning dollar dilution, not replacement.
India’s Role in De-Dollarization
- Rupee Trade Mechanism: RBI’s framework for international trade settlement in INR — activated for Russia oil purchases; expanded to 18+ countries’ banks.
- UPI Internationalisation: Operational in Singapore, UAE, UK, France, Mauritius, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka — India exporting its digital payment infrastructure as soft power and de-dollarisation tool.
- Gold Reserves: RBI added ~27 tonnes of gold in 2023–24; diversifying reserves away from dollar-denominated assets.
- INR Bond Market: ‘Masala Bonds’ and inclusion in JPMorgan GBI-EM index (2024) — deepening INR-denominated global capital markets.
Diagram — De-Dollarization: Mechanisms & Implications
FIG — De-Dollarization Causal Flow: Triggers → Mechanisms → Outcomes | © IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
05 · India’s Foreign Policy
India’s Strategic Pivot — Voice of the Global South IASNOVA.COM
India’s foreign policy under the Modi doctrine (2014–present) represents a qualitative shift from the Nehruvian tradition of principled non-alignment toward Strategic Autonomy + Active Leadership. India now positions itself not merely as a developing country seeking concessions, but as the architect of a reformed, inclusive multilateral order — making it the natural leader of the Global South in the 21st century.
Five Pillars of India’s Global South Leadership
① Voice of the Global South Summits
India convened the 1st Voice of the Global South Summit (January 2023, virtual) with 125 countries participating — the largest such conclave ever. The 2nd Summit (November 2023) consolidated India’s leadership. Key themes: climate finance, debt relief, digital public infrastructure, food & energy security. This directly leveraged India’s G20 presidency agenda.
② G20 Presidency (2022–23): The African Union Entry
India’s most transformative G20 legacy: securing the African Union’s (AU) permanent membership in the G20 — giving Africa 55 nations a seat at the world’s premier economic governance table. This was a deliberate Global South solidarity move, elevating Africa from observer to full member. The New Delhi Declaration (Sept 2023) also embedded Global South priorities: debt restructuring, climate justice, DPI access.
③ Strategic Autonomy — Hedging Between Blocs
India refuses binary alignment. It is simultaneously: (a) a Quad member (India-US-Japan-Australia); (b) SCO member (China/Russia-dominated); (c) BRICS member; (d) I2U2 member (India-Israel-UAE-US); (e) Non-Aligned Movement participant; (f) ASEAN dialogue partner. This multi-alignment maximises India’s bargaining power and exemplifies the Global South’s rejection of Cold War-style bloc discipline.
Diagram — India’s Multi-Alignment Architecture
FIG — India’s Multi-Alignment Web: Simultaneous membership across competing blocs enables strategic autonomy | © IASNOVA.COM
④ Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) as Soft Power
India’s ‘India Stack’ — Aadhaar (biometric ID), UPI (payments), DigiLocker (documents), ONDC (commerce) — is being actively exported as a development model. The DPI Coalition launched at G20 aims to replicate India’s DPI approach in 50+ countries. This is India’s most innovative tool for Global South leadership — offering a democratic, open-source alternative to China’s surveillance-heavy digital infrastructure exports.
⑤ Development Finance Alternative
India has launched the India-UN Development Partnership Fund, bilateral development partnerships (ITEC — Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation: 160+ partner countries), Lines of Credit ($12.3B committed), and is positioning itself as an alternative to both Western conditionality-laden aid and China’s debt-trap diplomacy.
Key India–Global South Initiatives at a Glance
| Initiative | Year | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| International Solar Alliance (ISA) | 2015 | 120+ member countries; India-led climate financing for solar-rich Global South nations; alternative to fossil-fuel dependence |
| Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) | 2019 | Funding resilient infrastructure in climate-vulnerable Global South — fills gap left by Western climate finance shortfalls |
| UPI Global Expansion | 2022–24 | Real-time payment system in 6+ countries; ‘Digital Rupee’ CBDC trials; reducing dollar in bilateral trade |
| AU-G20 Membership | 2023 | India’s flagship diplomatic achievement; permanent Africa seat in G20; landmark Global South solidarity moment |
| Voice of Global South Summits | 2023–24 | 125+ countries; alternative to Western-dominated multilateral forums; India as convener and agenda-setter |
| India-Africa Forum Summits | 2008–present | 5 summits; $12.3B LOCs; scholarships, training; positioning India as Africa’s preferred development partner |
© IASNOVA.COM
06 · Africa in World Politics
Africa’s Strategic Reorientation IASNOVA.COM
Africa is undergoing the most consequential strategic reorientation of any continent in the post-Cold War era. The continent — home to 1.4 billion people, the world’s youngest demographic bulge, and vast critical mineral reserves — is actively diversifying partnerships, asserting sovereignty over its resources, and demanding structural reform of the global economic order.
Key Drivers of Africa’s Reorientation
① Disillusionment with Western Conditionality
IMF structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) of the 1980s–90s are widely blamed for deindustrialisation and fiscal austerity that hollowed out public services. Western aid conditionality — tied to democracy standards, human rights frameworks, and neoliberal economic prescriptions — is increasingly resented as neo-colonial interference. African leaders increasingly prefer China’s ‘no-conditionality’ approach, even as they recognise its own risks.
② The Sahel Coup Belt: Security Partnership Shifts
2020–2023 witnessed a dramatic security realignment: Mali (2020, 2021), Guinea (2021), Burkina Faso (2022), Niger (2023), Gabon (2023), Senegal (contested, 2024) — a cascade of coups across the Sahel, all expelling French military forces (Operation Barkhane/Takuba) and in several cases inviting Wagner Group (now Africa Corps post-Prigozhin) Russian military contractors. This is not mere geopolitical opportunism — it reflects deep anti-French sentiment rooted in the CFA Franc monetary arrangement (14 African nations using a French-controlled currency).
③ Africa’s Critical Minerals Leverage
Africa holds: 70% of global cobalt (DRC), 90% of platinum group metals (South Africa, Zimbabwe), 60%+ of manganese, significant lithium, rare earth elements, uranium deposits. As the green energy transition accelerates demand for these minerals, Africa’s leverage is transforming. The African Union’s African Minerals Development Centre and initiatives to ban raw material exports (beneficiation requirement) reflect a new resource nationalism.
④ G20 African Union Membership (2023)
The AU’s entry into the G20 — championed by India — gives Africa a permanent, representative voice in global economic governance for the first time. Combined with the growing weight of South Africa (BRICS original member) and Ethiopia (BRICS+ new member), Africa’s multilateral footprint is expanding significantly.
⑤ Diversifying External Partners
| Partner | Africa Strategy | 2024 Status |
|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 China | Belt & Road Initiative; Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC); infrastructure loans; arms sales | Largest trade partner; debt sustainability concerns; ‘renegotiation pressure’ growing |
| 🇷🇺 Russia | Wagner/Africa Corps military presence; grain & fertilizer supply; arms; nuclear (Rosatom) | Sahel military dominance; Russia-Africa Summit 2023 (50+ countries attended) |
| 🇮🇳 India | ITEC training; Lines of Credit; UPI; solar; pharma (‘pharmacy of the world’); diaspora | Favoured partner for technology transfer; significant cultural goodwill; growing trade |
| 🇹🇷 Turkey | Africa summits; Bayraktar drones; Islamic diplomacy; trade corridors | Emerging arms supplier replacing Western suppliers in several markets |
| 🇦🇪 UAE & Gulf | Ports (DP World); agricultural land investment; sovereign wealth funds; financial services | Most active newcomer; critical partnership for East Africa (Horn, Kenya, Tanzania) |
Africa’s Own Institutional Assertion
- African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA, 2021): 54 signatories; world’s largest free trade area by number of countries; aims to double intra-African trade (currently only ~15% of total trade vs ~60% in Europe).
- Agenda 2063: AU’s 50-year development blueprint; demands sovereign industrialisation, value addition, diversification.
- African Pharmaceutical Agency: Reducing dependence on imported medicines; COVID-19 exposed dangerous dependency.
- African Peace & Security Architecture (APSA): African-led conflict resolution; reducing reliance on external peacekeeping forces.
© IASNOVA.COM
07 · Comparative Analysis
Global South vs G7 — Structural Tension in the Global Order IASNOVA.COM
The G7 (US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Japan) represents the post-WWII Western liberal order’s core — a club of advanced industrial democracies that has set global economic and political norms since Bretton Woods. The Global South’s rising assertiveness represents a direct challenge to G7 norm-setting dominance, creating the central structural tension of 21st-century international relations.
| Dimension | G7 Position | Global South Position |
|---|---|---|
| Global Governance | Defend existing multilateral architecture (UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank, ICC) | Reform or replace Western-dominated institutions; demand IMF quota reform, UNSC expansion |
| Democracy & Human Rights | Universal norms; conditionality for aid/trade; ‘Liberal Internationalism’ | Sovereignty principle; non-interference; ‘developmental authoritarianism’ acceptable; cultural relativism in rights |
| Russia-Ukraine War | Unambiguous condemnation; sanctions on Russia; weapons supply to Ukraine | Mixed; majority abstained/voted against UNGA resolutions; prioritise sovereignty but oppose blank-cheque arms supply; ceasefire diplomacy |
| Climate Finance | Committed $100B/year (Copenhagen 2009 promise — chronically unmet); technology transfer on commercial terms | Demand fulfillment of $100B; ‘Loss & Damage’ fund (agreed COP27); concessional technology transfer; historical responsibility for emissions |
| Trade Rules | Free trade orthodoxy; WTO dispute settlement; IP protection (TRIPS) | Policy space for industrial policy; TRIPS waiver for medicines/vaccines; South-South trade preferences; AfCFTA |
| Debt Architecture | Paris Club creditors; IMF structural adjustment conditionality | G20 Common Framework (slow/inadequate); debt cancellation demands; China as parallel creditor complicates negotiations |
| Digital Governance | Open internet; data privacy standards (GDPR-style); Western tech platform dominance | Digital sovereignty; data localisation; AI governance inclusion; demand for DPI models (India’s UPI alternative to Meta Pay/WeChat) |
| Energy Transition | ‘Phase out all fossil fuels’ (COP28 language); accelerate renewables | Right to development using all energy sources; ‘just transition’ with financing; Global South cannot afford Western transition speed on current finance |
© IASNOVA.COM
08 · Concept Glossary
Key Concepts & Terms Master Glossary IASNOVA.COM
| Term | Definition & Exam Relevance |
|---|---|
| Exorbitant Privilege | Coined by French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing; refers to the unfair advantage the US gains from its currency being the world’s reserve currency — ability to borrow cheaply, run deficits, and sanction others. Core concept in de-dollarisation debates. [UPSC GS-2, IFS, EU Concours] |
| Strategic Autonomy | Foreign policy doctrine prioritising independent decision-making over bloc alignment; associated with Nehruvian NAM heritage, now reinterpreted by India as ‘multi-alignment’ — maintaining partnerships across rival blocs simultaneously. [UPSC GS-2, UGC-NET, IFS] |
| Multiplex World | Amitav Acharya’s concept: a world of multiple overlapping regional orders, civilisational identities, and institutional frameworks — neither US-led nor Chinese-led, but genuinely plural. More optimistic than Mearsheimer’s conflict prediction. [UGC-NET, IFS, EU Concours] |
| Washington Consensus | 10-point neoliberal policy prescription (fiscal discipline, privatisation, trade liberalisation, deregulation) promoted by IMF/World Bank for developing nations; blamed by Global South for 1980s–90s development failures. ‘Beijing Consensus’ is its contested alternative. [UPSC, GRE, EU Concours] |
| Bandung Spirit | The ethos of Afro-Asian solidarity, anti-colonialism, and sovereign equality that emerged from the 1955 Bandung Conference. Frequently invoked in Global South diplomatic discourse. [UPSC, UGC-NET] |
| South-South Cooperation (SSC) | Technical, economic, and political cooperation among developing nations themselves — bypassing traditional North-South aid paradigm. India’s ITEC, China’s FOCAC, Brazil’s agricultural cooperation are examples. [UPSC, UGC-NET, GRE] |
| Dependency Theory | Structuralist theory (Frank, Cardoso, Wallerstein) arguing Global South underdevelopment is a structural result of its incorporation into the capitalist world-system as raw material exporters and cheap labour pools for the ‘core’ (Global North). [UGC-NET Political Science essential] |
| Petrodollar System | Post-1973 arrangement where oil-exporting nations (especially Saudi Arabia) price and receive payment for oil exclusively in US dollars, recycling surpluses into US Treasuries — sustaining dollar hegemony. Erosion of this system = core de-dollarisation dynamic. [UPSC, IFS, GRE] |
| Debt Trap Diplomacy | Theory that China extends unsustainable loans to developing nations, then uses debt default as leverage to seize strategic assets (e.g., Hambantota Port, Sri Lanka). Contested in academic literature (Brautigam challenges the evidence) but politically influential. [UPSC, IFS, US FSOT] |
| Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) | Interoperable, open-source digital platforms built as public goods (ID, payments, data-exchange layers). India’s ‘India Stack’ (Aadhaar + UPI + ONDC) is the global exemplar; being promoted as a democratic alternative to Big Tech-dominated and state-surveillance models. [UPSC GS-2 Science & Tech, IFS] |
| Loss & Damage (L&D) | Climate finance mechanism (agreed COP27, 2022) to compensate developing nations for irreversible climate change impacts — floods, sea-level rise — caused historically by Global North emissions. Operationalised at COP28 (2023). Key climate justice demand of Global South. [UPSC, GRE, EU Concours] |
| Multipolarity vs Multilateralism | Critical distinction: Multipolarity = dispersion of power among multiple great powers; Multilateralism = institutional cooperation among many states on rules. They can coexist (reformed multilateralism in a multipolar world) or conflict (competing power centres undermine multilateral rules). [IFS, EU Concours, GRE] |
© IASNOVA.COM
09 · Chronology
Critical Events Timeline — Global South & Multipolarity IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
10 · Exam Preparation
Exam Corner — Previous Year Questions & Practice IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
11 · Memory Tools
Mnemonics, Memory Aids & Recall Frameworks IASNOVA.COM
Remember: Argentina was invited but declined (Milei flip) — the 6th invite that didn’t become a 6th member.
Quick-Fire Recall: Key Numbers to Remember
© IASNOVA.COM
12 · 24-Hour Revision
Quick Revision Snapshot — Last-Day Prep IASNOVA.COM
🏛️ Key Institutions
- BRICS+ (9 members, 2024)
- New Development Bank (NDB, Shanghai)
- G77 + China (134 nations)
- Non-Aligned Movement (120+ nations)
- African Union (55 members; G20 2023)
- AfCFTA (54 signatories)
- AIIB (China-led, 105 members)
- SCO (Eurasia security+economic)
🔑 Key Theories
- Dependency Theory (Frank, Wallerstein)
- Multiplex World (Acharya)
- Offensive Realism (Mearsheimer)
- Liberal Order (Ikenberry)
- Exorbitant Privilege (Eichengreen)
- Washington Consensus vs Beijing Consensus
- Strategic Autonomy (Nehru→Modi)
- South-South Cooperation (SSC)
📅 Critical Dates
- 1955: Bandung Conference
- 1961: NAM founded
- 1974: NIEO Declaration
- 2001: BRIC coined; China WTO
- 2009: BRIC First Summit
- 2023: BRICS Johannesburg; G20 AU
- 2024: BRICS+ 9 members formed
- 2024: JPMorgan India GBI-EM inclusion
🌐 India’s Initiatives
- International Solar Alliance (ISA, 2015)
- CDRI (2019)
- India Stack / DPI Coalition
- UPI in 6+ countries
- ITEC (160+ partner nations)
- LOCs: $12.3B committed
- Voice of Global South Summits
- G20 AU Permanent Membership
🌍 Africa Fast Facts
- 70% global cobalt: DRC
- 90% PGMs: South Africa/Zimbabwe
- 14 nations: CFA Franc zone
- 54 AfCFTA signatories
- AU in G20: Sept 2023 (India’s gift)
- Wagner in Sahel: post-2020 coups
- Ethiopia in BRICS+ (Jan 2024)
- Egypt: Suez + BRICS+ 2024
⚖️ G7 vs Global South
- Ukraine: G7 condemns; GS abstains
- Climate: $100B pledge unmet; L&D
- Trade: free trade vs policy space
- Debt: Paris Club vs Common Framework
- Governance: defend IMF vs reform IMF
- Digital: open internet vs sovereignty
- China: G7 sees threat; GS sees partner
- India: straddles both camps
Tag Index — Topic Cross-Reference
© IASNOVA.COM
13 · FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions IASNOVA.COM
© IASNOVA.COM
📚 Academic Resources
Recommended Readings & Sources IASNOVA.COM
For deeper preparation in advanced exams (IFS, EU Concours, GRE):
📖 Books
- Amitav Acharya — The End of the American World Order
- Barry Eichengreen — Exorbitant Privilege
- Deborah Brautigam — The Dragon’s Gift
- Parag Khanna — The Future is Asian
- C. Raja Mohan — Samudra Manthan
📰 Journals & Think Tanks
- Third World Quarterly (journal)
- Foreign Affairs — Global South issues
- ORF (Observer Research Foundation)
- Chatham House (Africa/BRICS)
- Brookings Africa Growth Initiative
🌐 Official Sources
- MEA India — Joint Statements/Communiques
- BRICS.info — Summit Declarations
- African Union — Agenda 2063 docs
- IMF World Economic Outlook
- UN DESA — World Economic Situation
© IASNOVA.COM
