Indian Economy – Planning & Mobilisation of Resources (Block 1)
GS III • Indian Economy • Planning • Public Finance • Resource Mobilisation
1. What Is Economic Planning? Why Was It Needed in India?
In economics, planning means a deliberate, organised attempt by the State to influence the level, pattern and distribution of economic activity over a period of time to achieve defined goals – growth, equity, stability, self-reliance, employment, and modernisation.
At Independence, India was a low-income, structurally backward economy with:
- Very low per capita income and savings
- Dominance of agriculture & low industrial base
- Widespread poverty, unemployment & regional imbalances
- Weak infrastructure and fragile external sector
The leadership chose democratic planning – a mixed economy where the State would guide development through Five Year Plans, public investment, and policy direction, while allowing private sector and markets to operate.
Economic planning in India is a system of indicative, democratic planning where the State sets priorities, mobilises resources, and steers development through plans, budgets and institutions.
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
2. Evolution of Planning in India – From Five Year Plans to NITI Era
The Planning Commission (1950–2014) anchored centralised Five Year Plans. Over time, planning philosophy shifted from state-led heavy-industry strategy to market-friendly, liberalised, and decentralised planning.
A. Broad Phases of Planning
- 1951–65: Early Plans & Nehru–Mahalanobis Strategy – focus on heavy industry, public sector, import-substituting industrialisation.
- 1965–80: Crisis, Green Revolution, Poverty Focus – droughts, wars, but also agricultural transformation and anti-poverty programmes.
- 1980s: Partial Liberalisation – relaxation of industrial controls, technology imports, external borrowing.
- Post-1991: Liberalisation & Market-oriented Reforms – planning moves towards indicative role, private sector becomes main growth engine.
- Post-2015: NITI Aayog Era – Five Year Plans discontinued; emphasis on cooperative & competitive federalism, long-term vision documents, policy think tank role.
graph TB WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Evolution of Planning]:::root --> B[1950s–60s
Nehru–Mahalanobis]:::node A --> C[1970s–80s
Poverty & Green Revolution]:::node A --> D[1990s
Liberalisation]:::node A --> E[Post-2015
NITI Aayog]:::node2 B --> B1[Heavy industry, PSUs]:::note C --> C1[Agricultural push, IRDP]:::note D --> D1[Market reforms, disinvestment]:::note E --> E1[Think tank, cooperative federalism]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef node2 fill:#FDEDEC,stroke:#B03A2E,color:#7B241C; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:11px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
3. From Planning Commission to NITI Aayog – Structural Shift
In 2015, the Planning Commission was replaced by NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India). This symbolised the move from centralised, top-down planning to cooperative, bottom-up, ideas-driven policy.
Planning Commission – Key Features
- Non-constitutional, non-statutory body (1950).
- Prepared Five Year Plans and allocated plan funds to States.
- Emphasised public sector and centralised resource allocation.
NITI Aayog – Key Features
- Serves as the premier policy think tank of Government of India.
- Promotes cooperative federalism through the Governing Council involving CMs and LGs.
- Prepares long-term vision documents, SDG roadmaps, strategy papers.
- Acts as a platform for Centre–State–private collaboration.
| Dimension | Planning Commission | NITI Aayog |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Centralised plan body | Policy think tank |
| Federalism | Top-down, Centre-driven | Cooperative & competitive federalism |
| Instruments | Five Year Plans, fund allocation | Vision, strategy, policy coordination |
| Private Sector Role | Limited, PSUs dominant | Private sector as key growth partner |
graph TD WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Planning Framework]:::root --> B[Planning Commission]:::node A --> C[NITI Aayog]:::node2 B --> B1[Centralised plans, fund allocation]:::note C --> C1[Think tank, cooperative federalism]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef node2 fill:#FDEDEC,stroke:#B03A2E,color:#7B241C; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:11px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
4. What Is Mobilisation of Resources?
To implement any plan, India needs to mobilise resources – raise adequate financial, real and human resources to finance investment, social sectors, and governance. It is essentially the process of converting potential savings and tax capacity into actual public and private spending on development.
Resource mobilisation operates at three broad levels:
- Public sector – taxation, non-tax revenue, borrowing, disinvestment, external assistance.
- Private sector – household savings, corporate savings, financial markets, FDI/FPI.
- External sector – foreign capital, remittances, multilateral/bilateral flows.
graph TB WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Resource Mobilisation]:::root --> B[Public Sector]:::node A --> C[Private Sector]:::node A --> D[External Sector]:::node B --> B1[Taxes, borrowings, disinvestment]:::note C --> C1[Savings, markets, corporate CAPEX]:::note D --> D1[FDI, FPI, loans, aid, remittances]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:11px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
5. Public Resource Mobilisation – Tax, Non-Tax & Capital Receipts
The Union and State governments mobilise resources primarily through the budget. For UPSC, remember the three broad categories: tax revenue, non-tax revenue, and capital receipts.
A. Tax Revenue
- Direct Taxes – income tax, corporate tax, surcharge, etc.
- Indirect Taxes – GST (CGST, SGST, IGST), customs duties, excise on a few items (e.g. fuel).
- Tax reforms aim to improve tax buoyancy, compliance, and base while maintaining progressivity.
B. Non-Tax Revenue
- Dividends & profits from PSUs and RBI surplus
- Fees, fines, user charges, spectrum auction proceeds
- Royalty on natural resources etc.
C. Capital Receipts
- Market borrowings (dated securities, T-Bills)
- Loans from small savings, provident funds
- Disinvestment & strategic sale of public enterprises
- External assistance (multilateral/bilateral loans)
| Category | Examples | Key Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Revenue | Income tax, corporate tax, GST, customs | Tax base, evasion, efficiency vs equity |
| Non-Tax Revenue | Dividends, fees, spectrum, royalties | Volatility, dependence on PSUs & auctions |
| Capital Receipts | Borrowings, disinvestment, external loans | Debt sustainability, fiscal deficit, asset sale strategy |
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
6. Centre–State Dimensions in Resource Mobilisation
In a federal system, resource mobilisation is shared between the Union and the States. The Constitution assigns different tax bases to each level, and institutions like the Finance Commission and GST Council coordinate vertical and horizontal distribution.
Key Features
- Union controls broad-based taxes (income tax, corporate tax, customs, excise on a few items).
- GST is a shared tax – both Centre and States levy and share it via CGST/SGST/IGST.
- States also rely heavily on shares in central taxes, grants-in-aid, and their own taxes like excise on alcohol, stamp duty, etc.
- Finance Commission recommends tax devolution and grants to address vertical & horizontal imbalances.
| Level | Key Sources | Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Union Government | Direct tax, GST share, customs, borrowings | Fiscal deficit, off-budget liabilities |
| State Governments | SGST, excise, stamp duty, devolution, grants | Revenue stress, dependence on Centre, limited tax base |
graph TB WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Resource Mobilisation in Federal India]:::root --> B[Union]:::node A --> C[States]:::node B --> B1[Direct taxes, GST share, customs]:::note C --> C1[SGST, excise, transfers]:::note A --> D[Institutions]:::node2 D --> D1[Finance Commission, GST Council]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef node2 fill:#FDEDEC,stroke:#B03A2E,color:#7B241C; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:11px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
Growth, Development & Employment in India (Block 2)
GS III • Indian Economy • Growth • Development • Employment
1. Economic Growth vs Economic Development
Economic Growth means an increase in a country’s output (GDP). Economic Development means growth + structural change + improvement in human wellbeing (health, education, living standards).
Growth is quantitative; Development is qualitative + quantitative.
| Feature | Economic Growth | Economic Development |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Increase in GDP | Improvement in welfare & human capabilities |
| Focus | Output | Equity, inclusion, capabilities |
| Indicators | GDP, GVA, savings, investment | HDI, MPI, literacy, health, poverty |
| Scope | Narrow | Broad & multi-dimensional |
graph LR WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Economic Progress]:::root --> B[Economic Growth]:::node A --> C[Economic Development]:::node2 B --> B1[GDP ↑ Output ↑]:::note C --> C1[Equity, HDI, well-being]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef node2 fill:#FDEDEC,stroke:#B03A2E,color:#7B241C; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:12px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
2. Inclusive Growth – The Indian Policy Framework
Inclusive growth ensures that the benefits of economic growth are broad-based, regionally balanced, and pro-poor.
Key Elements
- Equal access to opportunities (education, credit, markets)
- Poverty reduction & social protection
- Labour-intensive manufacturing & MSMEs
- Gender-balanced development
- Regional balance (aspirational districts, NE initiatives)
graph TB WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Inclusive Growth]:::root --> B[Opportunities]:::node A --> C[Social Security]:::node A --> D[Regional Balance]:::node A --> E[MSMEs & Jobs]:::node B --> B1[Education, credit, markets]:::note C --> C1[Insurance, pensions, DBT]:::note D --> D1[Aspirational districts]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:12px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
3. Employment in India – Concepts & Indicators
Key Indicators
- LFPR – Labour Force Participation Rate (working + seeking work)
- WPR – Worker Population Ratio
- Unemployment Rate – proportion of labour force unemployed
- Informal sector share – > 80% of India’s workforce
Types of Unemployment (UPSC Must-Know)
- Disguised unemployment – common in agriculture
- Seasonal unemployment – rural/agricultural cycles
- Structural unemployment – skill mismatch
- Frictional unemployment – job-switching
- Cyclical unemployment – due to slow growth
graph LR WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Employment Scenario]:::root --> B[Indicators]:::node A --> C[Types of Unemployment]:::node2 A --> D[Key Issues]:::node C --> C1[Disguised, Structural...]:::note D --> D1[Jobless growth, informality]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef node2 fill:#FDEDEC,stroke:#B03A2E,color:#7B241C; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:12px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
4. Structural Transformation – India’s Employment Puzzle
Normally, labour shifts from agriculture → manufacturing → services. In India, labour is shifting directly from agriculture to low-productivity services.
Consequences
- Low productivity employment in services
- Manufacturing sector not absorbing labour
- Rise of informal jobs & gig work
graph TD WM[IASNOVA.COM]:::wm A[Structural Transformation]:::root --> B[Agriculture]:::node A --> C[Manufacturing]:::node A --> D[Services]:::node2 B --> B1[Large workforce, low productivity]:::note D --> D1[Gig work, informality]:::note classDef root fill:#D4EFDF,stroke:#1E8449,color:#145A32; classDef node fill:#EBF5FB,stroke:#2874A6,color:#1B4F72; classDef node2 fill:#FDEDEC,stroke:#B03A2E,color:#7B241C; classDef note fill:#F5F6F7,stroke:#B3B6B7,color:#424949; classDef wm fill:#FFFFFF,color:#FF0000,font-weight:900,font-size:12px;
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
5. Government Policies on Growth & Employment
Major Policies
- Make in India – manufacturing boost
- Skill India – skill ecosystem reform
- Startup India – innovation-led job creation
- PMEGP – micro-enterprises
- MGNREGA – rural employment guarantee
- PLI schemes – incentivised manufacturing
- Digital India & UPI – productivity improvement
| Policy Area | Objective | Economic Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing | Push exports, domestic capacity | FDI growth, PLI-led expansion |
| Skills | Improve employability | Bridges skill mismatch |
| MSMEs | Support small units | High employment potential |
| Social Security | Protect vulnerable groups | Reduces distress migration |
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
6. Key Challenges Ahead
- Persistently low LFPR (especially female LFPR)
- High informality & absence of social protection
- Slow manufacturing job creation
- Skill mismatch & automation
- Regional disparities in opportunities
India must balance growth with employment, productivity with inclusion, and technology with labour-absorption to achieve sustainable development.
★ IASNOVA.COM ★
