Development & Dependency: Quick Revision Module

Development & Dependency — Visual+Explanatory Guide

1) Concept of Development — From Economic Growth to Human Capabilities

Economic development emphasises rising income, productivity, and structural transformation (agriculture → industry/services). Sociological development goes further: it asks how institutions, culture, power, equality, sustainability and capabilities (Sen; Nussbaum) change so people can be and do what they value (health, education, voice, dignity). Development is thus a conversion process: growth enables structural change, which needs robust institutions to translate into human development.

AxisEconomic ViewSociological ViewUPSC Hook
DefinitionIncome, productivityInstitutions, culture, equality, capabilities“Beyond GDP” (Sen/Nussbaum)
MechanismCapital, tech, marketsDifferentiation (Parsons), rights, policy, movementsInstitutions matter
IndicatorsGDP/GNIHDI, GII, MPI, trust, sustainabilityTriangulate econ + social
CritiquesGrowth-first biasEthnocentrism, ecology, gender, powerMultiple modernities

2) Modernisation Theories — Rostow, Lerner, Inkeles & Smith, Parsons

Modernisation views development as a transition from traditional to modern structures via investment, technology, media, values, and institutions. It’s useful as a policy roadmap, but must be balanced with power-sensitive critiques (dependency/world-systems).

2.1 Rostow — Stages of Growth (Teleological Roadmap)

Rostow argues economies pass through five stages: (1) traditional society, (2) preconditions for take-off, (3) take-off (investment crosses a threshold; rapid industrialisation), (4) drive to maturity (diversification, technology deepening), (5) high mass consumption (widespread affluence). This offers neat sequencing but underplays power, dependency, and ecology.

2.2 Lerner — Media, Empathy & Participation

Lerner posits that media exposure creates empathy/psychic mobility—people imagine different lives, migrate, and participate politically. Communication thus lubricates modernisation, but media are embedded in power and ownership, and can misinform or exclude.

2.3 Inkeles & Smith — “Modern Personality”

Inkeles & Smith describe traits (time discipline, efficacy, universalism, openness) that schooling and work inculcate. This explains micro-to-macro links but risks essentialising culture, ignoring constraints of class/caste/gender.

2.4 Parsons — Differentiation & Evolutionary Universals

Parsons argues modernity proceeds through structural differentiation across AGIL functions—Adaptation (economy), Goal (polity), Integration (law/norms), Latency (culture/family)—and value generalisation (universalistic norms). This shows why institutions matter but can have status-quo bias.

TheoristDriverMechanismStrengthCore Critique
RostowInvestment & techStage progressionPolicy clarityTeleology; ignores power/dependency
LernerMedia & empathyParticipation ↑Role of communicationOwnership/power of media
Inkeles–SmithValues & educationModern personalityMicro–macro bridgeCulture essentialism
ParsonsDifferentiationAGIL + universalsInstitutional viewStatus-quo bias

3) Dependency Theories — Frank, Cardoso & Faletto, Amin

Dependency theory reframes underdevelopment as relational: the core extracts surplus from the periphery through unequal trade, finance, and political power. Variants differ in strategy—from dependent development via alliances (Cardoso–Faletto) to delinking (Amin).

3.1 Frank — Metropolis–Satellite Surplus Drain

Andre Gunder Frank shows how core “metropolises” draw surplus from “satellite” peripheries via unequal terms of trade, profit repatriation, debt service and political leverage. The periphery becomes underdeveloped because of its development in a subordinate world economy.

3.2 Cardoso & Faletto — Dependent Development

Cardoso & Faletto argue that some peripheries can industrialise within dependence through alliances between the state, local capital, and foreign capital. Outcomes vary by class coalitions (e.g., authoritarian ISI vs democratic bargains): growth may come with inequality unless inclusion is negotiated.

3.3 Samir Amin — Unequal Exchange & Delinking

Samir Amin highlights unequal exchange: global prices undervalue peripheral labour/nature while core firms capture rents using technology, finance, and market power. His strategy of delinking is not isolation but reorienting toward domestic linkages (demand, technology, finance) to reduce vulnerability.

ThinkerCore ClaimMechanismPolicy OrientationLimitation
FrankUnderdevelopment is relationalMetropolis–satellite surplus drainReduce dependenceAgency underplayed
Cardoso–FalettoDependent development possibleState–local–foreign alliancesStrategic integrationInequality can persist
AminUnequal exchangeCore price/tech powerSelective delinkingFeasibility trade-offs

4) World-Systems Theory — Wallerstein

Wallerstein sees a single capitalist world-economy divided into core (high-value, strong states), semi-periphery (mixed production, mobility), and periphery (raw inputs, weak states). This lens explains value chains, uneven development, and limited mobility; hegemony shifts across long cycles (Dutch → British → US).

ZoneProduction ProfileState CapacityLabour RegimeMobility Potential
CoreHigh-value manufacturing/servicesStrong rule-of-lawRegulated/free labourMaintain dominance
Semi-PeripheryMixed; upgrading nichesMedium/contestedHybrid regimesBuffer; up or down
PeripheryRaw/low-value assemblyWeak/dependentCoercive/cheap labourLow; needs coalitions

UPSC Answer Toolkit — How to Write

  • Define development both economically and sociologically; bring in “beyond GDP” (Sen/Nussbaum).
  • Use modernisation as a spine (Rostow/Lerner/Inkeles/Parsons), then critique with Dependency (Frank/Cardoso–Faletto/Amin) and World-Systems (Wallerstein).
  • Structure answers with visuals: refer to Diagrams 1–8 to show causal links quickly.
  • Indianise: value-chain upgrading, inclusion (social protection), regional gaps, sustainability.
  • Conclude: strategic integration + domestic capability-building + worker/citizen protections + ecological prudence.
Memory keys: Growth ≠ Development; Institutions convert growth → capabilities. Underdevelopment is relational (surplus drain). Semi-periphery buffers world-system. Delinking = domestic linkages first, not isolation.
Share this post:

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.