South China Sea Conflicts: Interactive Map and Complete Study Guide

Study South China Sea conflicts through an interactive political map covering the nine-dash line, Spratly and Paracel Islands, Scarborough Shoal, Second Thomas Shoal, Mischief Reef, Natuna Sea, Pratas Islands and Senkaku/Diaoyu. Learn the claimants, administration, UNCLOS principles and strategic importance for UPSC, State PCS, SSC, UGC-NET and AP Geography.

Country boundaries surround the South China Sea. Nine long red dash segments show a generalized nine-dash line. Symbols locate major disputed island groups, occupied features, maritime overlaps and flashpoints. An inset locates the Senkaku, Diaoyu and Diaoyutai Islands in the East China Sea. GULF OF TONKIN SOUTH CHINA SEA PHILIPPINE SEA NATUNA SEA CHINA VIETNAM PHILIPPINES MALAYSIA BRUNEI INDONESIA TAIWAN CAMBODIA THAILAND NINE-DASH LINE · 2009 UN MAP Paracel Islands Scarborough Shoal Spratly Islands Pratas / Dongsha EAST CHINA SEA INSET Senkaku / Diaoyu Outside the South China Sea proper
Political boundary Nine-dash claim Island group Flashpoint Military-held feature Maritime overlap
Claim lineUnilateral claim depiction—not an agreed maritime boundary

Nine-dash line

Parties / claimants

China; overlapping claims of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam

What is contested

The line appears on PRC maps around most of the South China Sea. Its exact legal character has been contested, while neighbouring coastal states assert maritime entitlements under UNCLOS.

Legal position

The 2016 Annex VII tribunal found no legal basis for PRC historic rights to resources beyond the maritime zones allowed by UNCLOS. It did not decide sovereignty over land features or delimit maritime boundaries. China rejects the award as null and void.

Why it matters

It overlaps vital sea lanes, fishing grounds, possible energy resources and several coastal states’ claimed exclusive economic zones.

Sources and map note

Political geography uses Natural Earth 1:10m data. The nine dash segments were redrawn against the 5-degree graticule in Figure 2 of the South China Sea Arbitration Award, reproducing the map attached to China’s 2009 UN notes CML/17/2009 and CML/18/2009. Endpoint positions remain approximate at this display scale. The line is a claim depiction, not an agreed maritime boundary. Feature markers are approximate and sized for visibility. This educational map does not take a position on sovereignty.

Natural Earth 2009 UN note and map 2016 arbitration UNCLOS AMTI claims map China’s stated position Japan’s Senkaku position

Share this post:
IAS NOVA Editorial Team
IAS NOVA Editorial Team
Articles: 699

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.